[7], Peterson said he could meet "any time, any place"[1][4][8] to debate and it was announced on 28 February 2019 that the debate was scheduled for 19 April 2019. Here is the original video extracted from https://www.jordanvsslavojdebate.com (livestream.com HLS source) using ffmpeg from Akamai CDN with the original audio and custom CC transcribed. 'Crustacean Jung v Cocaine Hegel': Zizek-Peterson debate - RT The very liberal gaze with demonizes Trump is also evil because it ignores how its own failures opened up the space for Trumps type of patriotic populism. The Petersoniek debate, officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, was a debate between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson (a clinical psychologist and critic of Marxism) and the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj iek (a psychoanalyst and Hegelian) on the relationship between Marxism, capitalism, and happiness. I mean primarily so called popularly neural-link, the direct link between our brain and digital machines, and then brains among themselves. The controversial thinkers debated happiness, capitalism and Marxism in Toronto. Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. Maybe we should turn around a little bit Marxs famous thesis, in our new century we should say that maybe in the last century we tried all too fast to try the world. And is not the standard, but the true unconstrained consumption in all these creeps here? things. something wrong was said therein, you ought to engage the content rather than Watching him, I was amazed that anyone had ever taken him seriously enough to hate him. T. S. Eliot, the great conservative, wrote, quote what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the work of art which preceded it. IEK V/S PETERSON: Anlisis del "debate del siglo". Studebaker concludes that "Peterson didn't prepare. The Fool and the Madman - Jacobin It felt like that. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson Disfrut la discusin filosfica entre Michel Onfay y Alain Badiou , pesos pesados del pensamiento alternativo, y qued satisfecho. live commentary is quite funny. Billed as "The Debate [, moderator, president of Ralston College, Doctor Stephen Blackwood. What happened to Peterson after his debate with Zizek? - Quora His12 Rules For Lifeis a global bestseller and his lectures and podcasts are followed by millions around the world. Zizek's opening statement is probably the most interesting part of the debate. Peterson El debate entre Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson posmodernismo. Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript.docx - Happiness: Below is the transcript of Zizeks introductory statement. If we compare with Trump with Bernie Sanders, Trump is a post-modern politician at its purist while Sanders is rather an old fashion moralist. Nothing Is a Greater Waste of Time Than the Planned Debate Between Thats what I would like to insist on we are telling ourselves stories about ourselves in order to acquire a meaningful experience of our lives. MICHAEL FEDOROVSKY 1* 1* Investigador Independiente y ensayista. I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. It was officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, and was drummed up thoroughly. The turn towards culture as a key component of capitalist reproduction and concurrent to it the commodification of cultural life itself are I think crucial moments of capitalism expanded reproduction. By Tom Bartlett April 4, 2019 If you want tickets for the forthcoming showdown between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek, which will be held later this month in Toronto, better act fast: There. It was full of the stench of burning strawmen. Credits for this section should go to the hard work of Xiao Ouyang and Shunji Ukai //, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUhYdqB2Jh7CU5Le0XgktKaoXQmnTdbv0-_kE5BQL6Q/edit?usp=sharing, Thank you so much for this, I had trouble understanding Zizek's pronunciation of the book on Christ's Atheism on the cross. Canad. "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality. What are two key areas a Release Train Engineer should focus on to support a successful PI. Second on how modernity is characterized by the absence of authority (and Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Facebook, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Twitter, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on LinkedIn, Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday, Slavoj iek vs Jordan Peterson Debate Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (Apr 2019), Why winning isnt the real purpose of arguing. Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate | Current Affairs This is NOT a satire/meme sub. Studebaker wrote that "Zizek read a bizarre, meandering, canned speech which had very little to do with anything Peterson said or with the assigned topic. There are two teams, each consisting of two or three speakers. Scholarly publications with full text pdf download. He also denied there is an inherent tendency under capitalism to mistreat the workers, stating you dont rise to a position of authority that is reliable in a human society primarily by exploiting other people. Overall, Peterson appeared to see capitalism as the best, though imperfect, economic model. No. And that was basically it. Through this renouncing of their particular roots, multi-cultural liberals reserve for themselves the universal position: gracefully soliciting others to assert their particular identify. This I think is the true game changed. Other commentators opted for snide, which I think is sad although the linked with its constellation of thinkers. Blackwood. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. Not only are we not allowed cheap excuses for not doing our duty, duty itself should not serve as an excuse. Second yes, we should carry our burden and accept the suffering that goes with it. First, since we live in a modern era, we cannot simply refer to an unquestionable authority to confer a mission or task on us. After writing less than nothing, zizek thought that he didn't yet get to the basic thought, that is the reason he wrote absolute recoil, a more difficult book than less than nothing, according. But these two towering figures of different disciplines and domains share more than a. commitment to thinking itself. It is just a version of what half a century ago in Europe was simply the predominant social democracy, and it is today decried as a threat to our freedoms, to the American way of life, and so on and so on. This page was last edited on 12 August 2019, at 11:41. [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. It was billed as a meeting of titans and that it was not. Bonus: Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. He said things like Marx thought the proletariat was good and the bourgeoisie was evil. They are not limited to the mating season. matters: meaning, truth, freedom. Instead they often engage in self-destructive behavior. This is I think now comes the problematic part for some of you maybe the problem with political correctness. Zizek also pinpointed white liberal multiculturalism as the reason for the Lefts current political woes. The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. iek.uk - "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality." It projects, or transposes, some immanent antagonism however you call it, ambiguity, tension of our social economic lives onto an external cause, in exactly the same way. He is a dazzling. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! So, let me begin by bringing together the three notions from the title Happiness, Communism, Capitalism in one exemplary case China today. What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and - Vice please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. He wandered between the Paleolithic period and small business management, appearing to know as little about the former as the latter. Let me mention the change enacted by Christianity. Slavoj iek - Wikizero.com Ive been a professor, so I know what its like to wake up with a class scheduled and no lecture prepared. First, on how happiness is often the wrong manifesto, which he'd re-read for the occasion. Zizek versus Peterson Peterson argues against the postmodern neo-Marxist position held by, in his terms, "the radical left." This position emerged during the '60s but was initiated by the Frankfurt School, which emerged after World War II as a response to the rise of fascism in Europe. The mere dumb presence of the celebrities on the stage mattered vastly more than anything they said, naturally. vastly different backgrounds). But this divine spark enables us to create what Christians call holy ghost or holy spirit a community which hierarchic family values are at some level, at least, abolished. His thoughts on social constructionism vs evolutionary psychology (comparing For more information, please see our Most of the attacks on me are now precisely from left liberals. talking about wherever he felt like that was tenuously related rather than I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate Current Affairs How Jordan Peterson Lost His 'Debate' Against Slavoj Zizek - The Federalist They play the victim as much as their enemies. IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript The 'debate of the century': what happened when Jordan Peterson debated Slavoj iek, psychoanalytic philosopher, cultural critic, and Hegelian Marxist. He said that belief in God can legitimize the terror of those who claim to act on behalf of God. "Qu produce ms felicidad, el marxismo o el capitalismo?". A big deal, with huge numbers, and really very little underneath. Peterson had said that people should seek meaning through personal responsibility and iek had said that happiness is pointless and delusional. [2][16] The monologue itself was less focused as it touched many topics and things like cultural liberalism, Nazism, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and xenophobia, among others;[2][15] and against the expectation of the debate format did not defend Marxism. A good criticism is the one made by Benjamin Studebaker. Really? norswap The Zizek Peterson Debate The people who laugh might do it that way, he replied. Zizek: The paradox to be happy there not a crucial misunderstanding here. Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I havent caught and corrected (I didnt expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how Petersons (native speaker of English) has been the harder one to transcribe. But precisely due to the marketing, However, I would like to add here a couple of qualifications. We're in for quite a night a quick word about format. this event had the possibility to reach a much wider audience. them, of all things, to French cuisine) are also worth a listen/read. In the end Peterson-iek was less of a heavyweight boxing match than a WWE Grand Slam. wrote about commons before). Peterson-iek debate - Wikipedia The same true for how today in Europe the anti-immigrant populists deal with the refugees. Please feel free to correct this document. interesting because of it. But even it its extreme form opening up our borders to the refugees, treating them like one of us they only provide what in medicine is called a symptomatic treatment. of the Century" was overhyped (overmarketed, really), and seemed poorly prepared In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. Peterson has risen to fame on the basis of his refusal to pay the usual fealties to political correctness. But, a danger lurks here, that of a subtly reversal: dont fall in love thats my position with your suffering. [12][13], The debate was divided into two thirty-minute introductions from each participant, followed by shorter ten-minute responses and time at the end for additional comments and answers to questions posed by the moderator, Stephen J. In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. Having previously enjoyed and written about both Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Im Zentrum der Dissertation steht die Typologisierung des homme fatal, des verhngnisvollen Verfhrers innerhalb der englischen Erzhlliteratur von der Romantik bis ins fin de sicle. #philosophytiktok #philosophy #slavojzizek #zizektok #zizek #leftist #based".My formula, maybe you would agree with it, is | my basic dogma is | happiness should be treated as a necessary byproduct | . I deeply appreciate evolutionary talk. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. Zizek Peterson Debate Transcript - GBATEDA At least Marxism is closed off now that Marx Peterson and iek represent a basic fact of intellectual life in the twenty-first century: we are defined by our enemies. google, pretty well on the center-right, and pretty badly on the left (broadly). Transcripts | Jordan Peterson And that was the great irony of the debate: what it comes down to is that they believe they are the victims of a culture of victimization. iek and Peterson met in Toronto on Friday. I hope reading the debate will help me understand the arguments better. Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender, "Jordan Peterson, Slavoj Zizek each draw fans at sold-out debate", "The 'debate of the century': what happened when Jordan Peterson debated Slavoj iek", "How Anti-Leftism Has Made Jordan Peterson a Mark for Fascist Propaganda", "There Is No One to Cheer for in the Potential Battle Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "Why do people find Jordan Peterson so convincing? It can well secretly invert the standard renunciation accomplished to benefit others. Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript Transcripts 2018-09-25T15:05:00-04:00. The Jordan Peterson-Slavoj iek debate was good for something intellectuals). Both of these men know that they are explicitly throwbacks. We have to find some This page has been accessed 35,754 times. The twentieth century left was defined by its opposition to the truth fundamental tendencies of modernity: the reign of capital with its aggressive market competition, the authoritarian bureaucratic state power. Peterson, I was interested to learn they'd have a debate. Please note, during tonight's presentation, video, audio, and flash photography is prohibited and we have a strict zero, tolerance policy for any heckling or disruption. Its all anyone can do at this point. {notificationOpen=false}, 2000);" x-data="{notificationOpen: false, notificationTimeout: undefined, notificationText: ''}">, We all get monkey mind and neuroscience supports the Buddhist solution, The mystery of New Zealands Tamil Bell, an archaeological UFO. Postmodernism: History and Diagnosis Transcript Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-05-17T08:28:01-04:00. Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. I cleaned up the Zizek's second turn speaking, since that section seemed to contain many errors: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs7mNIUsYt9kWcdO785ec_dEWmEHLo92yTso0CVtxNk/edit?usp=sharing. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Maybe that's why last night I finally caved and watched Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson take on Slovenian quasi-Marxist psychoanalyst and cultural theorist Slavoj Zizek. Zizek vs Peterson: A Muslim Perspective - Berkeley Institute for The French philosophy Andr Glucksmann applied Dostoyevskys critique of godless nihilism to September 11 and the title of his book, Dostoyevsky in Manhattan suggests that he couldnt have been more wrong. Due to a planned power outage on Friday, 1/14, between 8am-1pm PST, some services may be impacted. On April 19th, at the Sony Centre in Toronto, these two celebrated thinkers (and Big Think contributors) went head to head in a duel promisingly-dubbed Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism. Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. Egalitarianism often de facto means, I am ready to renounce something so that others will also not have it. If Peterson was an ill-prepared prof, iek was a columnist stitching together a bunch of 1,000-worders. This largely contrasts Peterson's viewpoint who admittedly has never used that term to refer in any way to the associated conspiracy theory, but only to raise critique about cultural phenomena that are, according to him, directly associated with postmodern thought. Jacques Lacan:Seminars - No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis So, here I think I know its provocative to call this a plea for communism, I do it a little bit to provoke things but what is needed is nonetheless in all these fears I claim ecology, digital control, unity of the world a capitalist market which does great things, I admit it, has to be somehow limited, regulated and so on. The solution is not for the rich Western countries to receive all immigrants, but somehow to try to change the situation which creates massive waves of immigration, and we are completely in this. The cause of problems which are, I claim, immanent to todays global capitalism, is projected onto an external intruder. Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism: the Peterson and iek Debate, I am releasing this transcript free of charge to best facilitate free use discussion of, the debate and the two authors. Petersons opening remarks were disappointing even for his fans in the audience. Modernity means that yes, we should carry the burden, but the main burden is freedom itself. In spite of protests here and there, we will probably continue to slide towards some kind of apocalypse, awaiting large catastrophes to awaken us. One of the most stupid wisdoms and theyre mostly stupid is An enemy is just a story whose story you have not heard. The Toronto Debate: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek on Ethics and If I visit your debate with Jordan Peterson it's on YouTube I felt you won that debate, and it's striking to me, the discussion between 1 hour 10 minutes and 1 hour 18 minutes. You're currently offline; make sure to connect for latest articles. Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek: The debate. | by Ulysses Alvarez Amidst the Peterson-Zizek Debate, We Should Still Think for Ourselves "[23], In commenting directly on how the debate was received, iek wrote: "It is typical that many comments on the debate pointed out how Petersons and my position are really not so distinct, which is literally true in the sense that, from their standpoint, they cannot see the difference between the two of us: I am as suspicious as Peterson. Rules for Life, as if there were such things. 76.3K ,809 . TikTok Zizek is my dad (@zizekcumsock): "From the Zizek-Peterson debate. Community Video : Free Community : Free Download, Borrow and - Archive In the Nazi vision, their society is an organic whole of harmonic collaboration, so an external intruder is needed to account for divisions and antagonisms. Next point. They are both highly attuned to ideology and the mechanisms of power, and yet they are not principally political thinkers. I have a hard time understanding Zizek, and am admittedly completely out of my depth when it comes to philosophy and Marxism and all the nitty gritty. Peterson was an expert on this subject, at least. At one point, he made a claim that human hierarchies are not determined by power because that would be too unstable a system, and a few in the crowd tittered. This Was An Interesting Debate. Along the same lines, one could same that if most of the Nazi claims about Jews they exploit Germans, the seduce German girls were true, which they were not of course, their anti-Semitism would still be a pathological phenomenon, because it ignored the true reason why the Nazis needed anti-Semitism.